“ WHY THESE EXPERIENCES “
questions and hypothesis :
following " all possibilities " and " process dimensions " ,
the question arising is " why this/these experience(s) " ?
" this set(s) of relations at various levels of abstraction " ?
It seems there are " choices " and " structures " arising , and that these structures at various levels of abstraction , and emerging from various levels of abstraction ,
develop a certain " crystallization " or " memory "
the process of the flow of experience can be seen with the use of the " process dimensions axiom " into the " dynamic positioning of abstract objects " into abstract dimensions - or the " meta cortex " proposed tool ( would be nice to develop this computer model - will be much easier with a computer model then with verbal language to show developments and implementation of the axioms ) ,
yet it is interesting to understand what determines the memory of the structures on which further emergence is based.
Flows / Channels / Opportunities can be opened up towards further creation and emergence when there is a Transcendent Consciousness of Experience , yet , I notice at least at a few levels of abstraction , such as that of human minds and the way humans experience , that Consciousness evolves and that the memory of it does not always stay.
In some cases , I feel the situation leads to the conciousness of the transcendent experience when there is no memory of the conciousness within the individual.
So the memory of the conciousness was channeled through the experience of the situation , from another " brane " or " level of abstraction / process dimension " coming from the situation.
So the meta crystallization of the structures , or more exactly , the crystallization of the consciousness of the experience of the structures leading to the crystallization of the abstract object / structures , does not necessarily come with the experience of the consciousness , although it seems repeated experience leads to it.
I would also go further by proposing the empirical hypothesis , and hopefully will be able to prove it with a computerized model of the axiom , that crystallization actually happens in a ego experienced flow of experience ( addiction flow - focus on specific channel ) ,
and that the transcendent flow leads to a De-Crystallization , and that this De-Crystallization that facilitates a further opening up of opportunities/channels/metatization/transcendence/opening of new multiple abstract objectified dimensions , which leads to further levels of abstraction and to greater process dimensions - and higher levels of energy flow / Qi flowing from the greater process dimensions.
In other words , a transcendent flow leads to the melting of " specific " crystallizations , while still having the capacity to use all of them.
Or instead of melting , maybe we could say it increases transparency and capacity for energy to flow from greater process dimensions through a increasing number of crystallizations and levels of abstraction of crystallizations of relations ,
or to put it again into other words : to also create opening to experience of new relations and crystallization of relations
As the various levels of abstraction are getting quite high when thinking about this , it would be useful to be able to have a support like a computer model , as to be able to visualize it and build with it more easily
Taking into account such empirical observations and intellectual developments ,
it would be interesting to experiment and verify them , through computer models and through other ( measured ? ) observations on the levels of abstraction we have most capacity of tangibility , and with ourselves , and then possibly further extend such observations into less yet increasingly tangible abstraction levels of relations.
It will be interesting to understand further conciousness and conciousness of experience , " energy " , crystallizations of relations , branes - levels of abstraction of process dimensions , crystallizations of relations , ...
I for example ask myself how , in a computer model of the axiom , the process of " fission " and " fusion " of levels of abstraction / branes such as " atoms " would look like ,
or also processes of the braking up of relations in processes such as " combustion " ,
or the connecting up of relations such as " photosynthesis "
and how this understanding that those various levels of abstraction could also help us experiment with models including the understanding of energy flows at higher levels of abstraction / branes / process dimensions
--
but this is just a rudimentary example . as we could use the model of the axiom for any processes , or any theories , including quantum physics , social sciences , semantics , ... or any science , knowledge , relation we can develop , input , and observe into a
" dynamic positioning of abstract objects " / or "meta cortex" if you prefer.
so one can imagine that the modeling tool can become a " brane " / abstract dimension in itself , and its memory of conciousness be used as the conciousness to be used into any other ( lower ? ) abstraction level , such as for
alternative politics and alternative economics ,
and also for psychology and all of the sciences and creative/discovery/creation , and to visualize processes whatever their flow , as to understand them and impact on them based on the meta conciousness the tool can provide and be a memory for ,
even when the crystallization - or " non crystallization " ( I call "non crystallization " a " non structure" into my initial " process dimension " texts and notes : http://oikoumene.coforum.net/DanteGabryell∞ or also to be found on https://www.registeredcommons.org/view/167/0/8058∞ )
of the experienced processes / the flow of conciousness of the experience
is not in the memory of the individual that uses it - although the tool can still facilitate the experience and eventually impact the flow of energy experienced by the individual and impact the eventual memorization of conciousness by the individual or any " structure " that is at a brane included within the experience of the flows that the tool can facilitate / provide.
In other words , I come back to this phrase from McLuhan :
" The medium is the Message "
( I would also like to see some of McLuhan s ideas visualized with the computer model of the process dimensions axiom )
To come back to memory , ( quantum ? ) gravitation and its eventual role and use in a abstract objects and process dimensions model is also a interesting field of research.
Is there some form of Gravity , or could we use some form of ( quantum ? ) gravity with abstract objects in infinite levels of abstraction - is such as form of ( quantum ? ) gravity what would make it possible for the abstract objects to see each other ?
How does such gravity work , and how would it impact (de)cristallization , and memory , flows of energy , and efficacy of energy flows on for example strings of abstract objects ?
How would the impact of such hypothetical gravity be on our " experience " on a certain specific set of relations at various levels of abstraction chosen from the infinity of relations possible ?
also see :
http://www.registeredcommons.org/view/167/0/8143∞
or also on
http://oikoumene.coforum.net/universeandall∞
It would also be interesting to experiement with the models as to understand the difference between
" creation " and " reproduction " - although as I see it , every reproduction is not a exact reproduction , and therefore is a creation.
It just uses a abstract object it already has in memory / has conciousness about as to be able to use it and make various relations with this object and other objects it has in memory - has a experience of ,
by that creating somewhat similar yet different and new creations.
Even creating very similar looking pieces of paper is different and still a creation process as it uses different objects , even though it are objects that have relations with similar patterns.
So reproduction is then creation too , but at a different level of abstraction , and/or abstraction of experienced conciousness.
But anyway , it would be nice to see and verify this on a computer model.
also see :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_space∞
http://del.icio.us/deliciousdante/referencemaps∞
There are no comments on this page. [Add comment]